I didn’t ask you for any lip. I asked you if you had a drink.

You know you’re in for a good time when the film start odd with a disclaimer about being a true representation of the times with real people. Couple that with a title like The Public Enemy and some good stuff is definitely going to follow. This is another old film screened in class and originally released in 1931. Like other movies we’ve watched, it definitely stands the test of time and easily recognizable as a tried and true genre. It also works well as a documentary of sorts showing the life and times of the early twentieth century.

The film begins showing the life of a couple troubled kids through adolescence and into adulthood. More than that it shows the somewhat playful lawlessness of the times. Stealing starts early on and seems to be a fact of life for the families and businesses the film spends time on. It seems to be a little too easy and too systematic for the young pair of Matt and Tom to become groomed at a young age for robbery. Though a bit more than frowned upon, this type of behavior seems to be more a topic of gossip than being labeled as unacceptable. At one point a family friend is killed and it’s brushed of as the man just hanging with “the wrong crowd”.

Soon enough the kids are adults and rising through the ranks. After being mentored by some of the more seasoned adults in town, the pair knows that you “gotta have friends”, and loyalty can’t be understated. Following lessons such as these allows the two to become  bootlegger distributors during prohibition times. This of course comes with some of the easily recognizable signs of success that hold true even today- throw money around, buy expensive clothes, take care of your family, make wise cracks to people, and feel invincible. The ever present life lesson that girls like “bad” boys is also present.

More than that however are the many struggles and decisions that Matt and more specifically Tom, are faced with. Such as cheating on a girlfriend, loose wives, getting revenge for a close friend or arguing with his more “respectable” war veteran brother. The film actually portrays PTSD probably before it was even called shellshock with an included argument about killing for country or killing for money. It also shows the  progression from being fascinated by just seeing a gun, to going around killing horses and old “friends” that have done them wrong. Of course both men are killed in gun fights that lead into the film’s second disclaimer at the end, “The END of Tom Powers is the end of every hoodlum. ‘The Public Enemy’ is, not a man, nor is it a character — it is a problem that sooner or later WE, the public, must solve.”


One thought on “I didn’t ask you for any lip. I asked you if you had a drink.

  1. It was cool that you mentioned the PTSD in the film. The film did well to show that PTSD does exist and happens to everyone even if they are healthy, young men. And when the brothers argued about killing for the country versus killing for money was a major point. Yes, they both end lives, but ultimately one brother is killing in the gangster version of life and the other brother is killing others that we are at war with and protecting the country. Veterans that get PTSD sometimes are reminded constantly of their times at war. That is not fun to deal with. But killing people for financial gain does not produce remorse because they don’t have emotions towards taking the lives of others. The men that kill for money only care about become more richer.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s